Panera Coffee Calories Hazelnut Coffee

de Sos ballos semper sunt sos nostros you Cherimus

[de ZuanneFrantziscu Pintore]

Deo Puru, who in no apo botadu Renato Soru, I know in pro pistighìngiu on who mudore East rutu as'ispessada chistione Subra de sa limba sarda. Not Pesso - and LU under Narender pro captatio benevolentiae in fide - Rutu Soru chi su sena moimentu s'intendat amparu and Duncan, "tutti home." S'imàgine SEMUS since chi chi est but gherreris rendent the unu inimigu sena Mancu averguare inimigu b'est is the one of pèntuma inimigu mancare fraigadu ispramadores bison in soils. Giòvanu ma prenu bond directions at Ladue avèrtidu Micheli: "I do not think chi Siantar galu alone times su" Ballad oxen ...". Thinner than in cussu "horse" s most b'at botantes Sardinian soils and soils "oxen" b'at amantiosos sa limbo Gasi and freckles and enemies of ToTu comment custas duas gasta bi nd’at in “nois”. Sos ballos, pro abarrare in sa paristòria de Micheli, sunt sos nostros. La naro mègius: sos ballos sunt sos nostros si cherimus ballare; no ant a los èssere si a un’ala sighit su lastimòngiu de chie perdet e a s’àtera sa barra de chie binchet. A un’ala e a s’àtera amus punnadu a pònnere sa chistione de sa limba sarda in su tzentru de sa pelea eletorale. Custa est una pelea pèrdida: s’economitzismu at bintu a manos prenas, a manca a dereta e finas in moimentos che a Irs e a Sardigna natzione (no est mancu in contu su Sdi) chi in sa gherra pro sa limba deviant mustrare sentidos chi, a bi so ca, non bi fiant. Si est a nos fundare in sas intervistas, iscritas e faveddadas, cun sos candidados presidentes, totus, b’at de prànghere pro sa mala sorte de sa limba. Neghe de sos giornalistas chi no ant pesadu sa chistione? Si podet dare. Ma unu chi de limba cheret faveddare, lu faghet, mancari dassende a un’ala àteras cosas. In un’artìculu essidu in Diariulimba puru, ponia una dimanda e un’imposta: “La lingua sarda non produce voti? Illusi”. S’illusu fia deo, ma non ca a beru cun sa limba sarda non si balàngiant cunsensos, si non ca nemos at chèrfidu pedire botos pro sa limba sarda. E mancari gasi totu sas coalitziones e sos partidos (Francu on SDI in on who cumparit) postu up front who knows how to program Issor limba cheret amparada. On moimentu pro sa limba dae devet Mogh cue, something pesse de importu mannu east knows first bia, to m'amento on who, who knows chistione de sa limba Gasi ispartinada east. Non sunt tempos de custos sigh to tell you to think: oh, but do not tie you to believe, eh, but who know Prus eja deo de credible tie. East now who knows about moimentu pro limba imparet To Play poker and to tell those who know lantzat chistione: "I see." http://www.sotziulimbasarda.net

Youtuve Movies Cogiendo

Glozel dance, a scandal that never ends

dae Gigi Sanna

If you come to a real scandal, as everyone will have noticed from this blog, about the attitude of a certain 'part' of archeology (Part I say that I'm not usually do lump) and some (I say 'some') on the Superintendent a written nuragica, a scandal even greater, given the incredible length of it, science is one of the Academy (with the addition of major cultural institutions in France, including museum) on the case Glozel. Here you can really touch the heights of absurdity, so much to discredit, due to a huge stain smears irreparably pages

Tablet opistrografa (written on both sides) of Glozel

spotless, the whole system of research as well, in the historical, archaeological and linguistic, gave evidence of the high time of unparalleled professionalism and objectivity. And there is no need to talk about why I should mention the works of the French giants of world science of the last century.
Everyone now knows, we all know. More Boards of Inquiry (except the initial fraudulent, tamed and controlled even despicable characters in the scientific world, repeatedly condemned as such by the courts Cusset, Riom and Paris) have found that items (all items) Glozel found in the Field of the Dead Fradin of the farm in France, are authentic. Enigmatic, yes, but autenticissimi. There are no more doubts.
The now century old Emile Fradin was always a supergalantuomo and there are no more shadows on the authenticity of what was, in ten years or more, found in its agricultural land. His detractors are not only long dead but also over time. Perhaps a fate not always benign and against him allowed to reach the age that (103 years), shouting and testifying to the end, the whole world, almost to the last breath, that it is true that there is a Science genuine, selfless and far-sighted there is another, monstrously selfish and blind, in bed in a subtle science is born, grows and thrives. A distorted
daughter that nobody would want, but there is: arruffona, superficial, lying, scheming, arrogant, lazy, denier. Often linked, but only for poor contracts and doctoral research servile to the tenets of a church of very few 'elected', which they use to constrain the many, so that nothing moves, everything that dies in the new 'the same instant in which it is being made. I would like to revive the Fromm and philosophers of the Frankfurt School, who is not a coincidence that we read and reread in the seventies, when we then counted (And how to count!) The different ways of having and being. Had the 'superb' beauty of being a vital, critical, dynamic, proactive, diffferent.
counted insane desire to love, to the place of the priests, bureaucrats and altars, to exist 'with' others and for others, and to be genuine, authentic and in harmony with the universe that is alive and beautiful because it moves and continually being proposed and once again (and said 'en passant', since I do vibrate some strings with your beautiful post, dear Gianfranco, was not a coincidence that those years of genuine 'movement', true 'being', are being asked not only foundation for the founding of the Partito Sardo / Partidu Sardu most beautiful of its history but also for the sardismo 'with self-consciousness, now ...' widespread ').
But now I see that in Europe and the world Fromm is seen as a poodle of the past, an old rag and vainly proposed: they may all act according to the 'having mode', ie in the manner

Another finding of Glozel

selfishness and inauthenticity as absolute, even where your house should not, or in science. In fact, the French science knows, but silent, and when she deigns to open his mouth is just to say, with hateful arrogance (which unfortunately exist in all latitudes), and for them the case Glozel does not exist. Indeed, for French science, he says, the case never existed.
But to understand all the way in which aberrant behavior has reached a certain university system 'closed' and 'crippling' (who wants to make a career be careful: not the machines, even saying the name Glozel!) Worth my little experience in France, in the famous University of Arts in Aix - en - Provence. Invited to the interest of journalist Guy Vancis Stephanopulos archaeologist Pier, then resident in Paris, to lecture on the discovery of writing nuragica (particularly that of tablets Tzricotu of Cabras), I said that I would have gladly talked nuragici written documents but also those glozeliani since, at least according to the results of my studies, the two records by type and content showed amazing but undeniable - as easily demonstrable - analogies . The response of university scholars, however, was dry.
For 'Nuraghe' each opening by the faculty (much to offer available, exceptionally, a time of five hours), but for the 'glozeliano' every close, not even a minute of action. Why would I bother only those who has long, long time, did not want to Glozel own feelings. Practically: take it or leave it. I was about to give up the conference when I came up with the idea of \u200b\u200btalking 'Anyway' to Glozel, without which neither teachers nor students of the institution (the conference was extended to them) aware of it. And indeed, when the time came, after showing documents and commented on the Sardinians, I asked them to follow up a certain argument on a subject of 'mysterious' (it was instead a well-known object in the collection of the Museum of Glozel, published in the Corpus des Inscriptions of Glozel dr. Antonin Morlet) that could 'also be supposed' (so said) found in their campaigns (Aix).
That argument was followed, with lively participation and interest, both epigraphic and on that content, in particular by J. Naudeau, Professor of History of Eastern religions, world-renowned expert. But when it came time, I interrupted, saying the fiction that the object was not to Aix but Glozel and I immediately asked excuse for not complying with the agreements. Then silence rose for me (and for friends and associates, who were unaware of the 'trick', which had followed me in that trip), however, was interrupted by interminable rice, or rather, the benevolent smile of professors and students, both benevolent and I was allowed to take until the end of the assumption about writing Glozel, what I had just started to develop with the the first document. So when I came to comment
dell'Apollinare 'chasseur' Museum (to whom I spoke later in a special international conference held in Cagliari in 2005), explaining that the clear 'acrophony iconography contained in the statue (wolves, dagger, necklace, top of arrow, etc.). could only be the Lossa Hunt (then the oldest image of the Sanctuary of Apollo Pito), one of the scholars (Assyriologist now become a dear friend of mine) got up to speak, in the light of that and other evidence, that the case was reopened Glozel. Without delay.
Knowing very well today I think he has done everything possible to talk about it and discuss it with other scholars, especially in the Faculty of Aix and Lyon, but knowing even more arrogance and 'resistance' nearly century-old historic Glozel opponents, I believe that his attempt is not generous, for now, just arrived at nothing. Indeed perhaps have brought many troubles, particularly if he has played on my miserable 'authorities'. The dogmas, you know, are dogmas. False always, for the scientific definition, like all dogmas. But there are, live and thrive in the shelter of each scandal ever touched them because no contradiction, as I am holy. However, if we can console, still remains a scandal. On everyone's lips, and perhaps also in the consciousness of those who support them.

http://gianfrancopintore.net

Best Printer For Iron On

The litmus test: Nora stele to us

dae Gigi Sanna

Here, the decisive test. Ergo, to us, and especially to our fathers Stele Nora! Of course, without diminishing the importance of so-called 'Phoenician' who have attended in the first centuries of the first millennium BC, the coast of Sardinia. It was not for another because one of the city (or more than one city) of the Syro-Palestinian coast and strengthened invented that alphabet of 22 letters that should have been so important to civilizations around the Mediterranean for a millennium or more. Therefore including the civilization of the so-called 'Nuragici', or the sources cited by ŠRDN Egyptian and Ugaritic.
A person (who prefer to keep a strict anonymity), has found a place in the top

the tag in front

Oristano (and I think now we should not attribute more to the case that traces of Sardinian archaic writing are found mainly in area 'Arborea', or in a well-defined territory of Sardinia: Cabras, S. Vero Milis, Abbasanta Paulilatino, Norbello, etc..), a stone pendant of dark gray, ellipsoidal ( 7.5 x 4.3 cm), containing signs of graffiti writing on both sides. In the first four signs of stress, type of 'archaic Phoenician', under which five dashes are drawn obliquely, one of which merged into the first of the graphemes. In the second six signs of the same type, which must be added, in all likelihood the 'sign' of the hole of the object (which was used for the string), which, along with two hyphens clear curved upper 'fork', provides the appearance of a head of an ox or a bull. The graphemes, given the high hardness of the stone, were recorded, most obviously, with a metal tip. All are clearly visible. The 'hole' shows, very visible traces of rubbing lanyard. The small stone though naively subject, unfortunately, un'improvvida because energetic cleaning by clay layer by those who recovered, was photographed from the same in both parts (v.foto), fortunately for us, the same day tempering.

seen from the back of the pendant

Proceeding (as usual for the Phoenician writing) in a regressive way, you notice the face in an 'ayin, a Beth, a Daleth, a second' Aleph, in the face of a B ' Aleph, a Beth, a sin, a res, a Daleth, a nun. Combining then the graphic sequence with that of Part A of Part B we have: 'Bd' 'b šrdn.
Now, as anyone can see, the text is one of those who allow themselves to translate easily. In fact, the first side is written a word ('bd), alone or composed, well-known in the field of epigraphy and Sardinia (see Guzzo MGAmadasi 1967. The inscriptions of Phoenician and Punic settlements in the West. Institute of Near Eastern Studies . University of Rome, ch. III, pp. 87, 95, 97.105, 106, 110, 117, 119, 122, 123, 132) is typical, it seems, the lexicon 'Phoenician' and Punic (alphabet neopunico) found Sardinia; word that means' servant '(eg'. abdmlqrt: 'servant of' mlqrt). In second are the words' b meaning 'father' and šrdn meaning 'man court'. Then the full sense of the entire inscription is: 'servant father's court ladies'. He who wore the pendant, likelihood as a sling, was a devotee, or, more likely, a priest of a temple of God the Father SHARDANA (the famous Sardus Pater 'Bab-y' or 'Bab-ay' of the temple Nuraghe before, 'Phoenician' (?) and then select 'Roman' Antas Fluminimaggiore: see, among others, Pumpkin 1989, The Temple of Antas, Dolphin ed.).
is not the case, of course, for the purposes of discretion and opportunities to proceed, here, with more and more detailed feedback (in terms epigraphic, palaeography, language, historical and religious) on inclusion of the object. Nor is there yet time seems to date the age of the pendant with a linguistic approach and / or through the form of signs of Phoenician type, however archaic.
runs but the duty to warn in this' card ', deliberately concise and informative primarily, who do not take lightly the' semplice'contenuto of the charm, not least because it shows write 'a puzzle', typical of nuragico; and also add, for the more distracted (and skeptics and deniers), it tends to confirm without a shadow of doubt, what other documents, but especially two, the shard of Orani and quoin Bosa, they say very clearly: Nora stele that does not contain a text speaks of 'Lords of Narnia and Kition (Dupont-Sommer), or' Nogaro builders of temples for Puma-y '(Fevrier), nor' achievements or exercise '(Cross, Barreca), or the' sons of Milkaton, founders of Nora '(Dedola), and even shows the sequence syntactic ŠRDN B,' Sardinia '(Ugas) and even less content with a' bold new wine that tread boys' (Sauren). The stele is
Nora what a long time (see above sardoa Grammata 2004, pp.316 -321 and 534 -538) suspected it to be: a document containing information related to the ancient religion sarda 'nuragica' supposedly written when it was at its height in all cities west coast of Sardinia (Tharros, Cornus, Nora, Bosa, etc.).. In it, 'test' the new document, it is written one of the three titles of God (the other two are in the same stele, 'aleph' bull 'and sb' 'God of hosts Star'), AB (a ) S (a) RD (a) N of Sardinia people. These other is not (the rieti again) if it sensed the gods (even if not detected) masterfully by Raffaele Pettazzoni the beginning of last century, that is YHWH. But, mind you, the Nora stele does not say just 'ŠRDN AB: H is written' AB ŠRDN, or 'Lord Judge Him Father'.
I think if you were given just a little bit 'of attention (again, just a little'), without unjustifiable 'a priori' and without hysterics at the sight of unwelcome news, to nuragici written quite a few documents, those that we propose ( unfortunately, painfully, to active resistance and passive) for over a decade (especially tablets Tzricotu Cabras, the seal of St. Imbenia of Alghero and the shard of Orange), scholars would learn and understand, among other things, one of the most striking aspects of the island's archaic language and writing of the second half of the second millennium BC, the widespread use and value of the so-called 'definite' (or 'sign commentator' or 'indicator') nuragico in the second half of the second millennium BC Semitic pronoun Determinative given by the 'target' (h) that - now we can safely say - work often, and for the god (yhw), for its frequent titles of 'light', 'father' and 'bull'.
I must add that I am particularly pleased to make domain this public document (which, for obvious reasons, at my encouragement, he decided to surrender as soon as possible) since, in a few days, we celebrate the 'Holy' Christmas. Everyone knows that the historical birth of Jesus, the son of Y (a) HW.Hē (so you have to separate the so-called 'tetragrammaton', with the sign 'commented' the pronoun in part), has nothing to do with date of the 'Christmas', as this is, astronomically speaking, simply the rebirth or the anniversary of the 'birth' Cyclic Sun Goddess, as we know, by many ancient peoples of East and West. But in Sardinia nuragica S'AN-YHWH or 'AB D' An, the holy father and bright bull was venerated on the day astronomical as evidenced, among other things, the Nuraghe, that the Templar symbol of creative energy of God in their orientation. When the early Christians, already in the early centuries, were in Sardinia to propagandize their faith, obliterating, with persistence worthy of a better cause, the name and the rites of yahu / YAKU, ie (B) abay Sardinian did not realize, because of the almost total loss of the local historical memory, which gave the hatchet firmly to themselves as well as to the natives. However, in those circumstances as I believe they are, the Sardinians (ŠRDN nuragici) the people who are historically more all the others, after the Palestinians can be proud of this ancient feast for the sun god. This is now history. The pendant it says, we believe, without question. And, given the particular deity 'Sinaitic', the tree of life, with all the 'army' of balls and bright stars, dear teniamocelo well as a symbol, which is certainly not of Nordic ancestry but Mediterranean.

http://gianfrancopintore.net