Youtuve Movies Cogiendo

Glozel dance, a scandal that never ends

dae Gigi Sanna

If you come to a real scandal, as everyone will have noticed from this blog, about the attitude of a certain 'part' of archeology (Part I say that I'm not usually do lump) and some (I say 'some') on the Superintendent a written nuragica, a scandal even greater, given the incredible length of it, science is one of the Academy (with the addition of major cultural institutions in France, including museum) on the case Glozel. Here you can really touch the heights of absurdity, so much to discredit, due to a huge stain smears irreparably pages

Tablet opistrografa (written on both sides) of Glozel

spotless, the whole system of research as well, in the historical, archaeological and linguistic, gave evidence of the high time of unparalleled professionalism and objectivity. And there is no need to talk about why I should mention the works of the French giants of world science of the last century.
Everyone now knows, we all know. More Boards of Inquiry (except the initial fraudulent, tamed and controlled even despicable characters in the scientific world, repeatedly condemned as such by the courts Cusset, Riom and Paris) have found that items (all items) Glozel found in the Field of the Dead Fradin of the farm in France, are authentic. Enigmatic, yes, but autenticissimi. There are no more doubts.
The now century old Emile Fradin was always a supergalantuomo and there are no more shadows on the authenticity of what was, in ten years or more, found in its agricultural land. His detractors are not only long dead but also over time. Perhaps a fate not always benign and against him allowed to reach the age that (103 years), shouting and testifying to the end, the whole world, almost to the last breath, that it is true that there is a Science genuine, selfless and far-sighted there is another, monstrously selfish and blind, in bed in a subtle science is born, grows and thrives. A distorted
daughter that nobody would want, but there is: arruffona, superficial, lying, scheming, arrogant, lazy, denier. Often linked, but only for poor contracts and doctoral research servile to the tenets of a church of very few 'elected', which they use to constrain the many, so that nothing moves, everything that dies in the new 'the same instant in which it is being made. I would like to revive the Fromm and philosophers of the Frankfurt School, who is not a coincidence that we read and reread in the seventies, when we then counted (And how to count!) The different ways of having and being. Had the 'superb' beauty of being a vital, critical, dynamic, proactive, diffferent.
counted insane desire to love, to the place of the priests, bureaucrats and altars, to exist 'with' others and for others, and to be genuine, authentic and in harmony with the universe that is alive and beautiful because it moves and continually being proposed and once again (and said 'en passant', since I do vibrate some strings with your beautiful post, dear Gianfranco, was not a coincidence that those years of genuine 'movement', true 'being', are being asked not only foundation for the founding of the Partito Sardo / Partidu Sardu most beautiful of its history but also for the sardismo 'with self-consciousness, now ...' widespread ').
But now I see that in Europe and the world Fromm is seen as a poodle of the past, an old rag and vainly proposed: they may all act according to the 'having mode', ie in the manner

Another finding of Glozel

selfishness and inauthenticity as absolute, even where your house should not, or in science. In fact, the French science knows, but silent, and when she deigns to open his mouth is just to say, with hateful arrogance (which unfortunately exist in all latitudes), and for them the case Glozel does not exist. Indeed, for French science, he says, the case never existed.
But to understand all the way in which aberrant behavior has reached a certain university system 'closed' and 'crippling' (who wants to make a career be careful: not the machines, even saying the name Glozel!) Worth my little experience in France, in the famous University of Arts in Aix - en - Provence. Invited to the interest of journalist Guy Vancis Stephanopulos archaeologist Pier, then resident in Paris, to lecture on the discovery of writing nuragica (particularly that of tablets Tzricotu of Cabras), I said that I would have gladly talked nuragici written documents but also those glozeliani since, at least according to the results of my studies, the two records by type and content showed amazing but undeniable - as easily demonstrable - analogies . The response of university scholars, however, was dry.
For 'Nuraghe' each opening by the faculty (much to offer available, exceptionally, a time of five hours), but for the 'glozeliano' every close, not even a minute of action. Why would I bother only those who has long, long time, did not want to Glozel own feelings. Practically: take it or leave it. I was about to give up the conference when I came up with the idea of \u200b\u200btalking 'Anyway' to Glozel, without which neither teachers nor students of the institution (the conference was extended to them) aware of it. And indeed, when the time came, after showing documents and commented on the Sardinians, I asked them to follow up a certain argument on a subject of 'mysterious' (it was instead a well-known object in the collection of the Museum of Glozel, published in the Corpus des Inscriptions of Glozel dr. Antonin Morlet) that could 'also be supposed' (so said) found in their campaigns (Aix).
That argument was followed, with lively participation and interest, both epigraphic and on that content, in particular by J. Naudeau, Professor of History of Eastern religions, world-renowned expert. But when it came time, I interrupted, saying the fiction that the object was not to Aix but Glozel and I immediately asked excuse for not complying with the agreements. Then silence rose for me (and for friends and associates, who were unaware of the 'trick', which had followed me in that trip), however, was interrupted by interminable rice, or rather, the benevolent smile of professors and students, both benevolent and I was allowed to take until the end of the assumption about writing Glozel, what I had just started to develop with the the first document. So when I came to comment
dell'Apollinare 'chasseur' Museum (to whom I spoke later in a special international conference held in Cagliari in 2005), explaining that the clear 'acrophony iconography contained in the statue (wolves, dagger, necklace, top of arrow, etc.). could only be the Lossa Hunt (then the oldest image of the Sanctuary of Apollo Pito), one of the scholars (Assyriologist now become a dear friend of mine) got up to speak, in the light of that and other evidence, that the case was reopened Glozel. Without delay.
Knowing very well today I think he has done everything possible to talk about it and discuss it with other scholars, especially in the Faculty of Aix and Lyon, but knowing even more arrogance and 'resistance' nearly century-old historic Glozel opponents, I believe that his attempt is not generous, for now, just arrived at nothing. Indeed perhaps have brought many troubles, particularly if he has played on my miserable 'authorities'. The dogmas, you know, are dogmas. False always, for the scientific definition, like all dogmas. But there are, live and thrive in the shelter of each scandal ever touched them because no contradiction, as I am holy. However, if we can console, still remains a scandal. On everyone's lips, and perhaps also in the consciousness of those who support them.

http://gianfrancopintore.net